Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1154 Immigration: Procedure for Granting Immigration Status
Ewing v. Eagle Tax, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Eagle Tax, Inc. and Awais Khan
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Arrant v. Cortes et al
as 3:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Melvin R. Arrant
Defendant:
V. Cortes, P. Wingo, Aukerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Khan
as 3:2019cv01254
Plaintiff:
Brian Lewis
Defendant:
Alan Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Khan et al v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00389
Plaintiff:
Javed Khan and Steffanie Singh
Defendant:
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC , Kuni SDL, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevenson v. Biter
as 3:2015cv01926
Petitioner:
Genghis Khan Ali Stevenson
Respondent:
Martin Biter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tadros v. Celladon Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv01458
Plaintiff:
Gail Fialkov, Wahid Tadros, Norman Jacobs and others
Defendant:
Celladon Corporation, Krisztina Zsebo and Rebecque J. Laba
Petitioner:
Joel Greenfield, Disclaimer Trust U/Art IV E/W/O Harriet Greenfield, The Bisaha Group and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lewis v. Cates et al
as 3:2015cv00791
Plaintiff:
Brian Deverick Lewis
Defendant:
Mathew Cates, Daniel Paramo, Alan Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Mabus et al
as 3:2014cv00319
Plaintiff:
Khalique Khan
Defendant:
Raymond E. Mabus , The Department of the Navy and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Avery v. Paramo
as 3:2013cv02261
Plaintiff:
Kyle Avery
Defendant:
D. Paramo, Frank Ruffino, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
