Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Tate v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00756
Petitioner:
Lionel Tate, Sr.
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards-Tate v. Palomar Health District
as 3:2023cv02014
Plaintiff:
Laurie Edwards-Tate
Defendant:
Palomar Health District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Houlsen v. Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01817
Plaintiff:
Adam Houlsen
Defendant:
Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tate v. Owens et al
as 3:2020cv00199
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Rios, Sgt. Alexander, Does 1-10 Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Markel Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Spurlin et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv02049
Plaintiff:
Dale M. Spurlin and Mary Spurlin
Defendant:
Elliott Turbomachinery Co., Inc., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Ferguson v. Villa et al
as 3:2017cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rafael Ferguson
Defendant:
M. Villa, G. Trujillo, H. Groth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv00715
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A. Tate
Defendant:
Carolyn L. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tate v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00622
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Tate
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , NDEx West, LLC and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
United States of America v. $70,927.00 in U.S. Currency
as 3:2012cv02471
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$70,927.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Johann Sebastian Tate
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Tate v. Robbins et al
as 3:2012cv00814
Plaintiff:
Gerald L. Tate
Defendant:
B. Robbins, P. Galeana, J. J. Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
