Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01155
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Hooker v. Wilkie et al
as 8:2020cv01248
Plaintiff:
Carlton E. Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Wilkie and William Barr
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Wright v. Cheatham et al
as 5:2020cv00232
Plaintiff:
Marcus Wright
Defendant:
Roy Cheatham and William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00870
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00785
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Freeman et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00443
Defendant:
Inspector General of the Florida Department of Corrections, Ronnie Fussell, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Jahmal C. Freeman and Ernest Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitetto v. Barr et al
as 5:2020cv00184
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Whitetto
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, J.A. Keller, Roy Cheatham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Soul Quest Church of Mother Earth, Inc. et al v. Attorney General, United States of America et al
as 6:2020cv00701
Defendant:
acting administrator Uttam Dhillon, Attorney General William Barr, U. S. Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Soul Quest Church of Mother Earth, Inc. and Christopher Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scroos LLC et al v. Barr et al
as 6:2020cv00689
Plaintiff:
Scroos LLC, Brigette Katz, Yael katz and others
Defendant:
Attorney General William Barr, Ken Cuccinelli, Kathy Baran and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
