Cases 1 - 10 of 39
BUSBY v. JOHNSON
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BUSBY
Defendant:
BOB JOHNSON, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORRIS v. GEO et al
as 3:2023cv24757
Plaintiff:
AREALEUS K MORRIS
Defendant:
GEO, MEDICAL PROVIDER AT BLACKWATER, L BERRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DORN v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH et al
as 4:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DORN
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BEN LANIER, BRENT JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. MOODY et al
as 4:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
BLAIR LANSTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
ASHLEY BROOKE MOODY, FULVIO JOSEPH GENTILI, ROBERT R JULIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TILLMAN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
WILSON TILLMAN
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2022cv22117
Plaintiff:
ROSE J MATTHEWS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DOE 1 and DOES 2-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
FRANKLIN v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA D FRANKLIN
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTON v. HAIR et al
as 3:2022cv06325
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS K BURTON
Defendant:
HAIR, WADE, HAYES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE et al v. AUSTIN et al
as 3:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, I, JOHN 2 DOE, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Defendant:
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, III, Secretary U.S. DHS Xavier Becerra, Secretary Air Force Frank Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUGUSTINE v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00123
Defendant:
MARK INCH, DAVIS, BAINE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
