Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 171 - 180 of 639
HAMMOND v. BIBB COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 5:2020cv00276
Defendant: MACON HOSPITAL, BIBB COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MEDICAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff: PAMELA-LEE HAMMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00178
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REVILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 7:2020cv00137
Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA, COLQUITT COUNTY GEORGIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: JOEL BENJAMIN REVILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2020cv00117
Respondent: BEN HILL COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF FITZGERALD
Plaintiff: DAVID LITTLE, II
Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA, BEN HILL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURTS, SHERIFF LEE CONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORRIS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2020cv00227
Respondent: STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner: DR STEVE A MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WRIGHT v. COLE et al
as 7:2020cv00100
Defendant: PAUL HOWARD, GWEN KING, DANNY PORTER and others
Plaintiff: DERRICK WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LASTER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2020cv00081
Defendant: GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff: JUSTIN LASTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEAKS v. GEORGIA et al
as 3:2020cv00072
Plaintiff: LARECUS RASHAD PEAKS
Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA and TERRENCE JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGE v. ALLEN et al
as 5:2020cv00219
Petitioner: D THOMAS PAGE
Respondent: MARTY ALLEN and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NICHOLS v. STATE OF GEORGIA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00179
Respondent: STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner: SHANE NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?