Cases 11 - 20 of 24
FOSTER v ECHOLS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al
as 7:2020cv00087
Defendant:
FLORENCE STATEN, MITCHELL CHURCH, ECHOLS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff:
LANA FOSTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MCLEOD v. DUKES et al
as 7:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
JERRI DUKES, BECKY ROTHROCK, HOWELL L WATKINS II REALTY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00445
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GIBSON v. BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER et al
as 5:2017cv00423
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE ONEAL GIBSON
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, PAUL EDWARDS and SCOTT CROSBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corbett v. Register et al
as 7:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
MARK CORBETT
Defendant:
CHESTER REGISTER , ROCKY CROSBY , BO CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
AUTAUGA QUALITY COTTON ASSOCIATION v. CROSBY et al
as 7:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
AUTAUGA QUALITY COTTON ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
TIM L. CROSBY , MARISA D CROSBY , BRANDON CROSBY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parten v. PERRY et al
as 1:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
RONALD PARTEN
Defendant:
EDGAR PERRY, RAYMOND BITTNER, JEANETTE BITTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
CROSBY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 7:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
JERRY MICHAEL CROSBY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
WILSON v. FLYNN et al
as 1:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
ALLEN DEWAYNE WILSON
Defendant:
C J FLYNN, RONNIE K BATCHELOR, MATTHEW CROSBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. WARNER ROBINS, GEORGIA et al
as 5:2011cv00428
Plaintiff:
DONALD CROSBY
Defendant:
Warner Robins, Georgia , STEVE WARMACK and HARRY DENNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
