Cases 31 - 40 of 131
MORRIS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2020cv00129
Petitioner:
WILLIE JERMAINE MORRIS
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LUCAS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2020cv00097
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HUGH LUCAS
Defendant:
NURSE HALL, NURSE PRACTIONER LINDSEY, GEORGIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLENN v. WICKER et al
as 5:2020cv00017
Defendant:
MESSER, MEDICAL DIRECTOR MORRIS, OFFICER HAMEEM and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GLENN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al
as 5:2019cv00491
Defendant:
RIVERBEND MEDICAL, DOE, DR STEVEN NEIGARTH and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OPPENHEIMER v. BERRY, et al.
as 5:2019cv00337
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Morris Network, Inc., Phillip D. Cox, WDEF-TV, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MORRIS et al
as 3:2019cv00018
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
Bobbi Jo Morris and Adam Moss
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
CLAYTON v. JOHNSON et al
as 7:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Commissioner HOMER BRYSON, Capt KRAKE, Capt JAVAKA JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORMILYN v. MORRIS et al
as 5:2018cv00370
Defendant:
MITZI HALL DON, DEANN MORRIS and DEPUTY WARDEN FRANKLIN
Plaintiff:
JAMES ELIAS CORMILYN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHRISTIAN et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 4:2018cv00147
Defendant:
EDDIE CHRISTIAN, FARMER'S TIRE CENTER, LLC, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JULLIA ALEXANDRIA MORRIS and FELICIA CHRISTIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
MORRIS v. TOMPKINS
as 4:2018cv00110
Petitioner:
JOHN ARTHUR MORRIS
Respondent:
DONNA TOMPKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
