Cases 1 - 10 of 48
FIFFIA v. WALMART INC
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE FIFFIA
Defendant:
WALMART INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
STANLEY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP et al
as 7:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Nichole Stanley
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP, Rashema Deloach, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00031
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN WATSON, NURSE PRACTITIONER LOMAMI, DEPUTY WARDEN MEADOR and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEOD v. DEWEY
as 7:2020cv00244
Defendant:
RICKIE LIMOGES, HOWELL L WATKINS, II, HOWELL L WATKINS II REALTY CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
NICHOLS v. CALDWELL
as 5:2020cv00448
Respondent:
WARDEN ANTOINE CALDWELL
Petitioner:
SHANE NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NICHOLS et al
as 7:2020cv00234
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEXANDER NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ONE SOUTH BANK v. TITSHAW et al
as 5:2020cv00379
Defendant:
Global Produce Sales, Inc., Mark A. Elliott, Lee Allen Wroten, III and others
Plaintiff:
OneSouth Bank and ONE SOUTH BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NICHOLS v. COLSON et al
as 1:2020cv00144
Defendant:
JAMES MURPHY, JIMMIE COLSON, WILLIE RELIFORD and others
Plaintiff:
WESLEY AARON NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2020cv00179
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner:
SHANE NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
