Cases 41 - 50 of 638
Rhone v. George et al
as 2:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Rhone
Defendant:
Paul M. George and The City of Kingsland, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Sweatt
as 2:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Ms. Johnnie Marene Thomas
Defendant:
Judge Robert C. Sweatt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Miller et al
as 2:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Daniel Miller, Gaytri Crupa Inc., Kedarnath 81, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Diaz v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Diaz
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Trevonza Bobbitt, Valderine Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Telfair County et al
as 3:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C. Davis
Defendant:
Telfair County, Edwin Neal, Annie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. Ward et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
William David Smith
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Warden Brian Chambers and Warden Antoine Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath et al v. Adams et al
as 6:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Antonio Heath, Crishaun Heath, Christen Heath and others
Defendant:
Warden Brian Adams, Joseph Barnes, Quan Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moody v. Geter et al
as 2:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Robert Moody
Defendant:
L. Geter, FNU, LNU C.O.s, D. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Rahian Amir Barber
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Warden T. Bobbitt, Officer Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
