Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Muecke v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv04053
Petitioner:
Adam Muecke
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. Tyson Foods, Inc et al
as 6:2022cv02025
Plaintiff:
Ann K. Wilson, Estate of Felicie Joseph and Ann K Wilson
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., John H. Tyson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lincoln Savings Bank v. Tyson Foods, Inc et al
as 6:2022cv02026
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Savings Bank and Estate of Kabeya Axel Mukendi
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc, John H. Tyson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Conway v. Dubuque County, Iowa et al
as 2:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Cory Conway and Cory Adam Conway
Defendant:
Dubuque County, Iowa, Joseph L Kennedy, Lucas Pothoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Cedar Rapids, City of et al
as 1:2021cv00053
Defendant:
Cedar Rapids, City of and Nathan Trimble
Plaintiff:
Tonyamarie Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harrington v. Spray et al
as 6:2021cv02026
Petitioner:
Daniel W Harrington, Jr
Respondent:
US Marshals and Adam Spray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plasa v. Spray et al
as 6:2021cv02025
Defendant:
Adam Spray and United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
Michael Plasa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miles v. Spray et al
as 6:2021cv02024
Plaintiff:
Conny Miles
Defendant:
United States Marshal and Adam Spray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Spray et al
as 6:2021cv02022
Petitioner:
Darryl Fonte Jackson
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service and Adam Spray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. Spray et al
as 6:2021cv02021
Respondent:
United States Marshal and Adam Spray
Petitioner:
David Quinndale Wright, Jr. and David Quinndale Wright, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
