Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Matthews v. Iowa Department of Corrections
as 3:2020cv03025
Petitioner:
Jerry Ray Matthews
Respondent:
Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pothoff v. Iowa, State of et al
as 2:2019cv01030
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pothoff
Defendant:
Iowa, State of and Michael Roehrkasse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Knowles v. Wolff et al
as 5:2019cv04071
Plaintiff:
Matthew G Knowles
Defendant:
Doug Melby, Colin Johnson, City of Denison, Iowa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen's Inc v. Frank et al.
as 5:2019cv04069
Defendant:
Tidepool Media, Inc, Timothy Frank, Matthew Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Hansen's Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jaques v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv04027
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Doc Matthew Jaques
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 423
Wise v. Wittig et al
as 2:2019cv01013
Defendant:
Michael J Shubatt, County of Dubuque Iowa, Monica Zrinyi Wittig and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jason Wise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SET RESISTANCE & REPLY DDLS WHEN MTN TO DISMISS IS FILED - SEE [18] - SCHED REPORT DUE 14 DAYS AFTER MTN TO DISMISS IS RULED ON
as 1:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
Shirley Rhodes, Jeremy Karg and Matthew R Lamarche
Defendant:
Transamerica Corporation, The Investment Committee of the Transamerica 401(K) Plan, Does 1 - 40 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Karg et al v. Transamerica Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01042
Plaintiff:
Shirley Rhodes, Jeremy Karg and Matthew R Lamarche
Defendant:
The Investment Committee of the Transamerica 401(K) Plan and Transamerica Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Tyson v. Keller et al
as 1:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr
Defendant:
Gary Keller and Matthew Sperfslage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Dietsch et al
as 1:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr
Defendant:
Gary Keller and Matthew Sperfslage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
