Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. A Black iPhone 8 Seized from Emilio Daniel Dillon
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
A Black iPhone 8 Seized from Emilio Daniel Dillon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture - Exploitation of Children
United States of America v. A Black Samsung Cell Phone Seized from Kenneth Crum
as 4:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
A Black Samsung Cell Phone Seized from Kenneth Crum
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture - Exploitation of Children
Black v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00276
Petitioner:
Pierre Fontain Black
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Patrick H. Payton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. 2014 Black Acura MDX
as 4:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2014 Black Acura MDK and 2014 Black Acura MDX
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Lloyd v. Telleen et al
as 4:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Lamont Lloyd
Defendant:
John Telleen, Micah P. Johnson, Derek G. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grider v. Black Hawk County Jail
as 4:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Tony Grider
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Newnan et al
as 4:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Lamont Lloyd
Defendant:
Newnan, Vigil, Julie Lien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Swift Pork Company et al
as 4:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Raymond Black
Defendant:
Swift Pork Company doing business as JBS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Horton v. City of Waterloo et al
as 4:2020cv00057
Plaintiff:
Nanette Horton
Defendant:
City of Waterloo, Waterloo Police Department and Black Hawk County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
