Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Diers v. Robinson et al
as 4:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Eugene Diers
Defendant:
Ted Robinson, Dan Fell, Ottumwa Residential Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1988 Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights
Rasmusson v. Monsanto Company, Inc.,
as 4:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
Ted Charles Rasmusson
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fulk v. Muscatine County Jail, et al.,
as 4:2019cv00249
Defendant:
Muscatine County Jail, Leman, Naylor and others
Plaintiff:
Ted Howard Fulk
Interested Party:
Alan Ostergren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad
Birchansky et al v. Clabaugh et al
as 4:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Lee Birchansky , Fox Eye Surgery, LLC , Korver Ear Nose and Throat, LLC and others
Defendant:
Gerd W Clabaugh, Michell Ricker, Karen Woltman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iole v. City of Marshalltown et al
as 4:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Ron Iole
Defendant:
City of Marshalltown, Marshalltown Police Department, Marshalltown Chief of Police Mike Tupper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cvp Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Grauer v. USA
as 4:2014cv00141
Petitioner:
Ted H. Grauer
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Severeid v. Sparks
as 4:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ted Earl Severeid, III
Defendant:
Stephen Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Marshall County, Iowa et al
as 4:2012cv00286
Plaintiff:
Edward B Hunt
Defendant:
Marshall County, Iowa and Ted G. Kamatchus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
