Cases 1 - 10 of 133
Gates v. Raoul et al
as 4:2020cv04110
Defendant:
Grace B Hou, Sharon Coleman, Kwame Raoul and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Raoul et al
as 4:2020cv04060
Defendant:
Grace B Hou, Sharon Coleman, Kwame Raoul and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez v. Barr et al
as 4:2019cv04259
Defendant:
Lisa Madigan, Kwame Raoul, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyce v. Madigan et al
as 1:2019cv01074
Defendant:
Kimberly Foxx, F/N/U Tyes, John Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Watkins et al
as 1:2019cv01030
Defendant:
Matthew Ray, Jacob Beck, Daniel Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rockhill Insurance Company v. Carri Scharf Materials Company, an Illinois corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01380
Defendant:
Carri Scharf Materials Company, an Illinois corporation and People of the State of Illinois, ex. rel. Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Rockhill Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Taylor v. Thompson
as 2:2018cv02243
Undetermined:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Edward L Taylor
Respondent:
Lisa Madigan and Scott Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyce et al v. Fox et al
as 1:2018cv01324
Defendant:
Kim Fox, Gov. Bruce Rauner, Lisa Madigan and others
Plaintiff:
Davion Morgan and Anthony Boyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv03085
Plaintiff:
Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., Darin E. Miller, Illinois Carry and others
Defendant:
Beverly J. Walker, Lisa Madigan, Kwame Raoul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Madigan et al
as 1:2018cv01013
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Parker
Defendant:
Lisa Madigan, John Baldwin and Unknown Supervising Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
