Cases 171 - 180 of 858
Brown v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv02852
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Cook County Sheriff, Cook County Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
D'eangelos S Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv02455
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, Chicago Police Officers and Chicago Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv02330
Plaintiff:
Reginald Gibson
Defendant:
Eugene Minick, Chicago Police Dept., James Diman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Chicago Police Dept., et al
as 1:2019cv02311
Defendant:
Allen and Chicago Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
Johnny Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv02033
Defendant:
Division 9 Maintence Dept, Division 9 Super Intendent, Thomas J Dart and others
Plaintiff:
Martice Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGraw v. City of Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv01948
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, City of Chicago Police Dept., Mary Ellen and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin McGraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobbs et al v. Dept of Children & Families et al
as 1:2019cv01941
Plaintiff:
Samantha Watkins and Nathaniel Cobbs
Defendant:
Dept of Children & Families and Kimberly Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bynum v. Prendo Forensics et al
as 1:2019cv01754
Plaintiff:
Dennis Bynum
Defendant:
Oak Brook Terrace Police Dept and Prendo Forensics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dryer v. Village of Dolton et al
as 1:2019cv01702
Defendant:
Sheehan, Village of Dolton and Village of Dolton Police Dept
Plaintiff:
Andrea Dryer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Promos 911, Inc. v. Sanker-Merrills d/b/a Mobile Art Dept.
as 1:2019cv01713
Plaintiff:
Promos 911, Inc.
Defendant:
Lanett Sanker-Merrills d/b/a Mobile Art Dept.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
