Cases 71 - 80 of 2,824
MCCALLUM v. LEIST et al
as 1:2009cv01256
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MCCALLUM and ROBERT MCCALLUM
Defendant:
JEFFREY LEIST, MUNCIE POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF MUNCIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DRAPER v. MASON et al
as 4:2009cv00133
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. DRAPER
Defendant:
STEPHEN MASON, TE-JUAN JOHNSON, KELLY COLVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWSOM v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2009cv01252
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL N. NEWSOM
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, CRAIG GRAGE, J. RAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERRILL v. STATE OF IN
as 1:2009cv01254
Petitioner:
JERRY MERRILL
Respondent:
STATE OF IN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VARIOUS COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
as 1:2009cv01246
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VARIOUS COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GREEN MOUNTAIN FINANCIAL FUND LLC v. LACROIX et al
as 1:2009cv01216
Plaintiff:
GREEN MOUNTAIN FINANCIAL FUND LLC
Defendant:
LORI RAPPAPORT LACROIX, LORI RAPPAPORT LACROIX and MARGUERITE DOWNS RAPPAPORT
Third Party Plaintiff:
LORI RAPPAPORT LACROIX, LORI RAPPAPORT LACROIX, LORI RAPPAPORT LACROIX and others
Third Party Defendant:
MARGUERITE DOWNS RAPPAPORT, GREEN MOUNTAIN FINANCIAL FUND LLC, SOUTHWEST GUARANTY, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KOPITZKE et al v. PEKIN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2009cv00131
Plaintiff:
DAVID KOPITZKE, CHRISTOPHER KOPITZKE and MATTHEW KOPITZKE
Defendant:
PEKIN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
