Cases 61 - 70 of 9,785
COLEMAN v. MYERS
as 1:2022cv01883
Plaintiff:
MICHALE ANGELO COLEMAN
Defendant:
MATTHEW MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. NEWMAN
as 4:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SMITH
Defendant:
ROBERT B. NEWMAN and LISA T. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VOGEL v. MAC'S CONVENIENCE STORES LLC
as 1:2022cv01787
Plaintiff:
Carl Vogel
Defendant:
MAC'S CONVENIENCE STORES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CHAMBERS v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv01774
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. CHAMBERS
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GATLIN v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2022cv01782
Plaintiff:
JERELLE GATLIN
Defendant:
LISA HAMBLEN, REGAL, MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAY v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
PATTY J. LAY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TRAIN et al v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC D/B/A LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. D/B/A LOWE'S et al
as 1:2022cv01977
Plaintiff:
DAVID TRAIN and JANICE TRAIN
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC D/B/A LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. D/B/A LOWE'S and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY v. 5400 COLLEGE AVE LLC
as 1:2022cv01807
Plaintiff:
THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
5400 COLLEGE AVE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
SHORES et al v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv01795
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SHORES and CHRISTOPHER KIBBEY
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, RANDAL TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
JOHNSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2022cv01812
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
T. THOMPSON and GEO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
