Cases 71 - 80 of 9,785
AHLERS v. SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE & SPIRITS LLC WELFARE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN et al
as 1:2022cv01756
Plaintiff:
JAMES AHLERS
Defendant:
SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE & SPIRITS LLC WELFARE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN and BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
DUPORT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv01748
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DUPORT and ESTATE OF CAROL DUPORT
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MANN v. KITTERMAN et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
DENNIS MANN
Defendant:
CORYDON POLICE CHIEF MATT KITTERMAN, OFFICER MICHAEL ANDRY and OFFICER MICHAEL ANDREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EDMONDSON et al v. GERMAN AMERICAN BANK
as 1:2022cv01745
Plaintiff:
MIRANDA P. EDMONDSON and JOSHUA A. EDMONDSON
Defendant:
GERMAN AMERICAN BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
BROCK v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2022cv01734
Plaintiff:
CLYDE BROCK
Defendant:
LISA HAMBLEN, REGAL, MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SISSON v. FORESTAL
as 1:2022cv01725
Petitioner:
IVY R. SISSON
Respondent:
KERRY J. FORESTAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JESSIE v. LEACH
as 1:2022cv01727
Plaintiff:
JACOB LAZARUS JESSIE
Defendant:
B. LEACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
