Cases 71 - 80 of 9,785
MORALES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01834
Plaintiff:
MORGAN MORALES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CRUZ-RIVERA v. USA
as 1:2022cv01936
Petitioner:
ROBERTO CARLOS CRUZ RIVERA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
BROCK v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2022cv01734
Plaintiff:
CLYDE BROCK
Defendant:
LISA HAMBLEN, REGAL, MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUTTLE v. STILLABOWER et al
as 1:2022cv01737
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS TUTTLE
Defendant:
TYLER STILLABOWER and CODY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MANN v. KITTERMAN et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
DENNIS MANN
Defendant:
CORYDON POLICE CHIEF MATT KITTERMAN, OFFICER MICHAEL ANDRY and OFFICER MICHAEL ANDREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAPES V. TOP TIER MARKETERS LLC DBA ARTFILY ET AL
as 4:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
TARA MAPES
Defendant:
TOP TIER MARKETERS LLC D/B/A ARTFILY, MEAGAN BROADWATER individually and d/b/a Creatiuns,, DEAN BROADWATER individually and d/b/a Creatiuns, and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
