Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Jane Magnus-stinson
Cases 81 - 90 of 11,870
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02308
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TRANBARGER v. ANDERSON POLICE DEPT.
as 1:2023cv02293
Plaintiff: DALE C. TRANBARGER
Defendant: ANDERSON POLICE DEPT.
PIRANT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02290
Petitioner: JAMIL M. PIRANT
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TYREE v. EASTWOOD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02303
Plaintiff: SHANE TYREE
Defendant: KENT EASTWOOD, CHRISTINA PACE, FRANK WOLFE, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCOY v. BIOMAT USA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02282
Plaintiff: KEITH MCCOY
Defendant: BIOMAT USA, INC., APRIL and JAN
CHAMBERS v. MONROE COUNTY CT. et al
as 1:2023cv02281
Petitioner: MICHAEL S. CHAMBERS
Respondent: MONROE COUNTY CT., JUDGE (TERESA HARPER), ATT. (STUART BAGGERLY) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BANKHEAD v. ERNEST et al
as 1:2023cv02268
Plaintiff: ACTORA MECONN BANKHEAD
Defendant: J. ERNEST, J. JACKSON and BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OAK STREET FUNDING LLC v. HALPERN
as 1:2023cv02245
Plaintiff: OAK STREET FUNDING LLC
Defendant: PELEG HALPERN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
STITTS v. WALLEN et al
as 1:2023cv02253
Plaintiff: TURAMA STITTS
Defendant: WALLEN and PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2023cv00569
Plaintiff: CODY A. RICHARDSON
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?