Cases 1 - 10 of 8,915
Tetmeyer v. City of Indianapolis et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AYON v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
MANUEL GARCIA AYON, JR.
Defendant:
FOSTER, AFOLAYAN, BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOISVERT v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOISVERT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DAVEY v. JEFFERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
JERRY DAVEY, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEAVELL, K. KAVANAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FEY v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WAYNE FEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON and STEVE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE et al v. SEGLER CONCRETE FINISHING LLC
as 1:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE, INDIANASTATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS and CEMENT MASONS HEALTH, WELFARE, PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
SEGLER CONCRETE FINISHING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
