Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SIMPSON v. ROKITA et al
as 1:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SUE SIMPSON
Defendant:
TODD ROKITA, KATIE JENNER, PARK D. GRINDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
SMILEY v. JENNER
as 1:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
KAYLA SMILEY
Defendant:
DR. KATIE JENNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REINOEHL et al v. PENN-HARRIS-MADISON SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER REINOEHL, JASON REINOEHL and SARAH REINOEHL
Defendant:
PENN-HARRIS-MADISON SCHOOL CORPORATION, PENN-HARRIS-MADISON SCHOOL BOARD and KATIE JENNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REINOEHL v. MERRILL et al
as 1:2022cv01974
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER REINOEHL
Defendant:
JOHN MERRILL, KATIE M. HOBBS, ALEJANDRO PADILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
K.M. et al v. ROBISON et al
as 1:2021cv02469
Plaintiff:
K. M. and WILLIAM MACKIE
Defendant:
SCOTT ROBISON, DEBBIE UNGAR, MICHAEL COUSSENS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. NAJJAR et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
QUANTAE A JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID K. NAJJAR, TODD RUETZ, MICHELLE MCCUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANDERSON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS et al v. ROKITA et al
as 1:2021cv01767
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, MARTINSVILLE CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, AVON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS and others
Defendant:
TAMMY MEYER, TODD ROKITA and KATIE JENNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
