Cases 11 - 20 of 171
YOUNG v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv01852
Plaintiff:
MAVERICK ALEXANDER YOUNG
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
MACLIN et al v. RILEY et al
as 1:2023cv01776
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MACLIN and VICKIE DRIVER
Defendant:
LUCAS RILEY, ALEXANDER GREGORY, CARL CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLAINE v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
DILON BLAINE
Defendant:
DAVIS, RUSH and ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv01602
Plaintiff:
RYAN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, ADONIA MYKONA, ANDREA FULTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. ROKITA et al
as 1:2023cv01498
Plaintiff:
DARION JOSEPH ALEXANDER
Defendant:
TODD EDWARD ROKITA and JACOB HOWERTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ALEXANDER v. UNITED CONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
DARION JOSEPH ALEXANDER
Defendant:
UNITED CONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVICES and RONALD C. GILBERT, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DIGENIS v. HALLAL et al
as 4:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER G DIGENIS and ALEXANDER G. DIGENIS, M.D.
Defendant:
ELI R HALLAL, SUSAN P HALLAL, ELI R. HALLAL M.D. L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
ALEXANDER v. CAPITAL ONE
as 1:2023cv01182
Plaintiff:
DARION JOSEPH ALEXANDER
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
