Cases 11 - 20 of 36
DIRCKS et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv00451
Defendant:
RICHARD PAYNE, JEFFREY KELLER, BENNII WELDY and others
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN DIRCKS and BARRY DIRCKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHELPS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00424
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
DAVID PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHELPS v. SAUL
as 3:2019cv00234
Plaintiff:
REX PHELPS
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MWANGANGI v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2019cv04105
Defendant:
BEN PHELPS, FRANK NOLAND, TREY HENDRIX and others
Plaintiff:
DAUDI M MWANGANGI and DAUDI M. MWANGANGI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHELPS et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv02881
Plaintiff:
CASEY PHELPS and JACLYN PHELPS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHELPS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv02597
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
WARREN PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HADDOCK v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2019cv02078
Defendant:
Paul W Bellows, Robert P. Ferguson, Michael B Wagner-Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Haddock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLISON et al v. FIRST MERCHANTS BANK
as 1:2018cv02678
Defendant:
FIRST MERCHANTS BANK
Plaintiff:
R Anthony Ellison, Amy Phelps, R. ANTHONY ELLISON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PHELPS v. COOK MEDICAL LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04020
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MAURICE PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
