Cases 21 - 30 of 919
SIMS v. DENMEN et al
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
DENMEN, LEE, SHERRY DON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
WESLEE MYKLE ROSS JENKINS
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY, FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL, DERRIK MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv07084
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO A. JONES
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
JOHNSON v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRICIA PRETORIUS, DUSHAW ZATECKY, SARAH SNOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WOLCOTT POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
JARREN JONES and JERREN JONES
Defendant:
WOLCOTT POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2023cv02262
Plaintiff:
JARREN JONES and JERREN JONES
Defendant:
FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. WHITE COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2023cv02260
Plaintiff:
JERREN JONES
Defendant:
WHITE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv02167
Petitioner:
DALLAS JONES
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
