Cases 21 - 30 of 371
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BELL v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00238
Petitioner:
RANDALL KIRK BELL
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DAVIS v. IDOC et al
as 1:2022cv01158
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DAVIS
Defendant:
IDOC, MRS. QUICK, MRS. KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. MARION COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EDWARD BELL
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY JAIL, JOHN LAYTON, GOWDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2009mc00077
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAWN DESIREE CUMMINGS, FAZIA DEEN-BACCHUS, LISA MARIE DIRIG and others
CLERVRAIN et al v. DIMON et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, BRANDAKO, INC and ASHELEY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. HILLENBURGH et al
as 4:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
NICK A. COOPER
Defendant:
CHERYL HILLENBURGH and SABRINA BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUMPHREY v. CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2021cv00126
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS L. HUMPHREY
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPARTMENT, SUBRENA BELL and CHERYL HILLENBURGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ERVIN v. MARION COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2021cv00247
Defendant:
MOENDS, BAIG, SINCERE and others
Plaintiff:
MORICE ERVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
