Cases 21 - 30 of 809
DOE et al v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY - BLOOMINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Defendant:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY - BLOOMINGTON, LIBBY SPOTTS, GRETCHEN HANDLOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
WEATHERS v. FRANCIS et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND L. WEATHERS, JR.
Defendant:
FRANCIS, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. DENMEN et al
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
DENMEN, LEE, SHERRY DON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. KOHL'S, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN THOMAS
Defendant:
KOHL'S, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
PARISH v. HINSHAW et al
as 2:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
TONY PARISH
Defendant:
JEFFREY HINSHAW, PENNINGTON, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. HAMILTON COUNTY AND JOHNSON FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02216
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CHAMBERS
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY AND JOHNSON FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOSH CAREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARRA v. CREAR et al
as 3:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
GERMAN PARRA
Defendant:
CREAR, BOSTOCK, SPAYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OHLEMEYER v. FAST FUND LENDING et al
as 1:2023cv02143
Defendant:
RAYCEN RAINES, III, FAST FUND LENDING, WAKPAMNI LAKE COMMUNITY CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
DANA OHLEMEYER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
WALKER v. DOE(S)
as 2:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
JOHNIE AKWAN WALKER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DOE(S)
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
JOHNIE AKWAN WALKER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
