Cases 21 - 30 of 287
PETER et al v. WOJCICKI et al
as 1:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
MARIA PETER, MICHAEL PETER, JULIKA BERGER and others
Defendant:
SUSAN WOJCICKI, WILLIAM HENRY GATES, STPHANE BANCEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KIRWAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06713
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
PETER KIRWAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHELTON v. PETERS et al
as 1:2021cv02984
Plaintiff:
RENEE SHELTON
Defendant:
JUSTIN PETERS, CITY OF MUNCIE and CITY OF MUNCIE, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLERVRAIN et al v. DIMON et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, BRANDAKO, INC and ASHELEY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERS v. REAGLE
as 1:2021cv02858
Petitioner:
FRED PETERS
Respondent:
D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOELE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02501
Plaintiff:
Peter E Boele and PETER E. BOELE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ASHLOCK v ROGATNICK et al
as 2:2021cv00286
Defendant:
WALTER BRYAN ASHLOCK, ROGATNICK, CINDY MCGEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARKER v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
PETER DJUAN DONTRELL PARKER
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, BERRY GLOBAL/BERRY PLASTICS, LAWMAN TACTICAL SECURITY & CONSULTING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUPAL v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv01997
Plaintiff:
PETER CUPAL
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
