Cases 31 - 40 of 110
PIERCE v. BROWN
as 2:2020cv00177
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Petitioner:
DONALD A. PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEEYLEN v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00756
Defendant:
WILSON, VINCENT STANLY, SCOTT CALLAHAN and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR KEEYLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE PRINCIPLE VENTURES, INC. v. JH TAX SERVICE AND BOOKKEEPING INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00004
Defendant:
TAMMY TRIMBLE, JH TAX SERVICE AND BOOKKEEPING INC., CONNIE KINLEY and others
Plaintiff:
PIERCE PRINCIPLE VENTURES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KREILEIN v. WADE et al
as 1:2019cv04888
Defendant:
PIERCE, STEPHEN MCLEAN, B. WADE and others
Plaintiff:
ALAN KREILEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. HERRERA-JARAMILLO et al
as 4:2019cv00255
Defendant:
SYNERGY TRANSPORTATION, INC., PABLO G HERRERA-JARAMILLO and PABLO G. HERRERA-JARAMILLO
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA L PIERCE and CHRISTINA L. PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00222
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
INGRAM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv04285
Defendant:
TERRY, ROSHAY, WILLSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES INGRAM and CHARLES WILLIS INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TYSON v. CITY OF NEW CASTLE et al
as 1:2019cv03389
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW CASTLE, Henry County IN, NEW CASTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Tyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLEMAN et al v. WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00366
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, INC., NIKKI TAFOYA, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ZARAGOZA and ROBERT L. HOLLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
