Cases 31 - 40 of 80
JOHNSON v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2021cv02155
Plaintiff:
MAURICE JOHNSON
Defendant:
JERRY K. FORESTAL, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, MARION COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DOCTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDWICK v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00954
Defendant:
WELLPATH, ROSE HODGSON, UNKNOWN CCS EMPLOYEES and others
Plaintiff:
TRACEY HARDWICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWAIDNER v. KATATAT et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
JEREMIE SWAIDNER
Defendant:
KATATAT and QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. MARTIN COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 2:2020cv00467
Defendant:
JOSH BRULLA, QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE, MARTIN CO9UNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
CODY DARNELL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.D. v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00427
Defendant:
AUSTIN BARRON, VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JOHN PLASSE and others
Plaintiff:
D. D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREWS v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2020cv00337
Defendant:
CHARLES FUNK, CANDY, VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WAYNE CREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv04575
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, INC., MARION COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAUGH v. VIGO COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2019cv00539
Plaintiff:
TERRY GENE BAUGH, SR.
Defendant:
EMERSON, VIGO COUNTY JAIL and QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMLET v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv04255
Defendant:
JOE HOGSETT, CORRECTIONS CARE SOLUTIONS, BOOK-IN NURSE DEBRA, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. HAMLET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
