Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 171
JOHNSON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff: STEPHEN JOHNSON
Defendant: VANIHEL, HENDERSON, HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02762
Plaintiff: AUDREY RENEE ALEXANDER
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
CONNOR v. BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2021cv02583
Plaintiff: WILLIAM ALEXANDER CONNOR
Defendant: BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALTERS v. USA
as 1:2021cv02433
Petitioner: LEVI ALEXANDER WALTERS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BEALS v. CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 4:2021cv00150
Plaintiff: WARREN ALEXANDER BEALS
Defendant: CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. ZATECKY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00336
Plaintiff: OCTAVIUS DEONTE ALEXANDER
Defendant: DUSHAN ZATECKY, EDWARDS, ETHRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACEVEDO v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00292
Plaintiff: GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00291
Petitioner: NIJUL QUADIR ALEXANDER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TESTANI v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv01697
Defendant: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER TESTANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLS v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2021cv00088
Defendant: BRENT MILLER, INDIANA STATE POLICE, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff: JACOB MILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?