Cases 41 - 50 of 80
HOSTETLER et al v. DOE 1 et al
as 1:2018cv03995
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MILLER, GEORGE BISHOP, VANCE BRIGGS and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 2 and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRUCE v. DOE et al
as 2:2018cv00526
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #2, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN DOE #1
Plaintiff:
JASON KENNETH BRUCE
Interested Party:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON v. WILEY et al
as 1:2018cv03045
Defendant:
C. WILEY, J. GRIFFITH, JON DOE and others
Plaintiff:
J. PEARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. BAUER et al
as 1:2018cv03037
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
JOHN DOES #2-5, BRIAN BAUER, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CISLO v. BANDY et al
as 1:2018cv02510
Defendant:
CRAIG CRAIGE, JOHN DOE #1, DALE BANDY and others
Plaintiff:
RONNIE B. CISLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRYOR v. USA DIVING, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv02113
Defendant:
WILL BOHONYI, THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY DIVING CLUB and USA DIVING, INC.
Plaintiff:
ESZTER PRYOR and JANE DOES 2-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BERRY v. WEXFORD HEALTH MEDICAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2018cv01327
Plaintiff:
EARLIE BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
BARNS DOE, BRAD DOE, COLLINS DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS v. THE MARION COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2018cv01002
Defendant:
BULLER, CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS /MARION COUNTY, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
LAURENCE PARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEVY v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2017cv03090
Defendant:
JOHN DOE (1), JOHN DOE (2), T. SCOTT HUNT and others
Plaintiff:
GAI LEVY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VENICE PI, LLC v. DOE 1 et al
as 1:2017cv02328
Defendant:
DOE 1, DOE 10, DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
VENICE PI, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
