Cases 41 - 50 of 407
KING v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00988
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
DEANNA G. KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIRCKS et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv00451
Defendant:
RICHARD PAYNE, JEFFREY KELLER, BENNII WELDY and others
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN DIRCKS and BARRY DIRCKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINKLE et al v. BAYER et al
as 1:2021cv00384
Defendant:
RK HOLDINGS, LLP, RURAL KING SUPPLY STORE NO. 25 (MUNCIE, INDIANA) and BAYER
Plaintiff:
MARY LOU HINKLE and DAVID HINKLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALVEY et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
as 3:2020cv00263
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA M DAUBY, FAYE KING, LYNNE RICE and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02758
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KING v. BRODERICK et al
as 1:2020cv02828
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON, CITY OF ANDERSON and TOM BRODERICK
Plaintiff:
ANIKKA KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA v. LAWSON et al
as 1:2020cv01825
Defendant:
KEVIN C. SMITH, SUZANNAH WILSON OVERHOLT, PAUL RAUSCH and others
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREDERICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2020cv00187
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF WASHINGTON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WILLIAM FREDERICK doing business as THE KINGS OF COURT BENCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KING v. SAUL
as 4:2020cv00172
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. KING
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JONES v. MAYOR et al
as 1:2020cv01804
Defendant:
MAYOR, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JON B KING, CHIEF, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
TED BELCHER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
