Cases 41 - 50 of 190
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MADISON v. HOCHSTEDLER et al
as 1:2021cv02267
Plaintiff:
MILES MADISON
Defendant:
DAVID L HOCHSTEDLER and ROYCE CAMPBELL & SONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRUMBACK v. MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv02027
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRUMBACK
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SCOTT MELLINGER, WALTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOUMI et al v. KREUTZBERGER et al
as 1:2021cv01948
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED TOUMI, MADISON AUTO LLC D/B/A MADISON AUTO SALES and MADISON AUTO, LLC doing business as MADISON AUTO SALES
Defendant:
DAVID WILLIAMS and JOSHUA SCOT KREUTZBERGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. COURTNEY et al
as 4:2021cv00090
Defendant:
CITY OF MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT and BOB COURTNEY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFADDEN v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv01239
Defendant:
SWITZERLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT., INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and MADISON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT.
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DECK v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv01078
Plaintiff:
RICK DECK
Defendant:
JEFFERSON COUNTY, PERKINS, BOB COURTNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA v. MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC. et al
as 4:2021cv00062
Defendant:
MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC. WASHINGTON D.C., MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC. UNITED STATES and MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIBBS v. MADISON COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2021cv00923
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND LEE GIBBS
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
