Cases 51 - 60 of 118
PASSMORE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv00533
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, ROBERT CARTER, JR., ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASSMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. INDIANA STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2020cv02584
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE POLICE, INDIANA SWAT TEAM, AARON J. KEMPLE and others
Plaintiff:
MARIANNA C. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv02560
Plaintiff:
LINDA PEREZ
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
LAUDERDALE-EL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2020cv00486
Defendant:
KEITH HARTZELL, CORIZON CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES, SUSAN SMOOTHERY and others
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINTZ v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00443
Defendant:
AMY WRIGHT, PEREZ and WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA LINTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE-BEY v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2020cv00382
Defendant:
CHRIS A. WILLIAMS, PEREZ, ERIC J. HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WHITE-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2020cv00310
Defendant:
POWERS, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, TERRE HAUTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv01445
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
Robert Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEREZ v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00214
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Claimant:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
BRIAN PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAYFIELD v. BURRIS et al
as 2:2020cv00140
Defendant:
CODY BURRIS, RICHARD BROWN, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
CAMERON MAYFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
