Cases 61 - 70 of 732
WRIGHT v. JONES et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
JAMA JONES, MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. REGAL
as 1:2023cv00418
Petitioner:
STEPHEN M. DAVIS
Respondent:
DENNIS REGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MENZIE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. MENZIE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CITY OF NEW CASTLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. OFFICER HARTLEY et al
as 4:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
JERRY T. DAVIS
Defendant:
OFFICER HARTLEY, LT. THOMAS, MAJ. O'LAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASKO et al v. STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF VIGO et al
as 2:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
DAVID PASKO, LASHAWAN TOMPKINS, GRAYLON BELL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF VIGO, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS OF VIGO COUNTY, BILL WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOORE v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS MOORE
Defendant:
KEVIN GILMORE, J. SNYDER, K. HUNTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv00195
Petitioner:
LYNDON C. DAVIS
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. UNKNOWN DOCTORS
as 2:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
TYLER DAVIS
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DOCTORS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARNER v. ANDERSON HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY D. WARNER
Defendant:
ANDERSON HOUSING AUTHORITY, KIM TOWNSEND, LORRAINE RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
