Cases 71 - 80 of 806
JONES v. GRANT et al
as 1:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
BRANDON GRANT, DARRON GRANGER, DUSTIN ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SILVERS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
KERRY E. SILVERS
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONLIN v. LAYMA, LLC, aka LAYAMA, LLC, and dba LITTLE LAKE LENDING
as 1:2023cv00377
Defendant:
LAYMA, LLC also known as LAYAMA, LLC doing business as LITTLE LAKE LENDING, LAYAMA, LLC, BEN G. RAY, III and others
Plaintiff:
ELISE CONLIN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
WHITFIELD v. DOE #1 et al
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
NARVEL WHITFIELD
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGLOSSON v. BALLARD et al
as 2:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MCGLOSSON
Defendant:
J. BALLARD and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PAYNE v. VANIHEL et al
as 1:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
NICK PAYNE
Defendant:
VANIHEL, MCCONNELLY, REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLATER v. HYATTE et al
as 1:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
STEVE SLATER
Defendant:
WILLIAM HYATTE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DELTA FAUCET COMPANY v. WATKINS et al
as 1:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
DELTA FAUCET COMPANY
Defendant:
BEN WATKINS, JOHN DOE, 1, JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
DAKE v. CHAO et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAKE
Defendant:
STANLEY CHAO, FIRST LOAN, NP FINANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MOORE v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS MOORE
Defendant:
KEVIN GILMORE, J. SNYDER, K. HUNTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
