Cases 71 - 80 of 165
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ORDER INN, INC. et al v. TJ ENTERPRISES OF INDIANA, LLC, et al
as 1:2014cv00517
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, TOM GANSER and TJ ENTERPRISES OF INDIANA, LLC
Plaintiff:
ORDER INN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
JENNINGS v. VILASCA et al
as 1:2014cv00498
Plaintiff:
LAURA A. JENNINGS
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and TOM VILASCA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CROWE v. VANWORMER
as 3:2014cv00032
Petitioner:
DAVID CROWE
Respondent:
TOM VANWORMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ELKIN et al v. TOM ROUSH, INC.
as 1:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
MIKE ELKIN and RUSTINA ELKIN
Defendant:
TOM ROUSH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FERRELL v. FRANCUM et al
as 1:2013cv01875
Plaintiff:
TYLER FERRELL
Defendant:
TOM FRANCUM, SGT. J. SERVIZZI and C/O SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISK v. INDIANA et al
as 2:2013cv00383
Defendant:
PAMLA BAILS, BOBBIE BELDEN, CHRISTINE CLEMENS and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. CITY OF MUNICE et al
as 1:2013cv01667
Plaintiff:
JOSH BAKER
Defendant:
CITY OF MUNICE, GEORGE HOPPER, TOM PULLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BOUCHER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 1:2013cv01585
Plaintiff:
RITA BOUCHER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and TOM VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
