Cases 1 - 10 of 14
KNOX v. CHEATAM et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
KEVERY KRISTOPHER KNOX
Defendant:
CHEATAM, T. BARNHART and J. SAJNAJ SAJNAJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BARNHART et al v. BRANHAM et al
as 4:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
STAN BARNHART and DONNA BARNHART
Defendant:
MIKE BRANHAM, GREG DAY, TONY SEIDL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIUS DEONTE ALEXANDER
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, EDWARDS, ETHRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALTERS v. CRANK et al
as 2:2019cv00568
Defendant:
CHERYL PETTY, ANASTASIA BARNHART, STEPHANIE CRANK and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIDLEY v. BARNHART et al
as 1:2016cv00097
Respondent:
BARNHART and GREGORY ZOELLER
Petitioner:
DAREN E. RIDLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PEREZ v. GRISMORE et al
as 1:2013cv01504
Defendant:
AVON POLICE DEPARTMENT, ADAM BARNHART, RYAN GRISMORE and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. PEREZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEAL v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00101
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, CHRISTOPHER A. GREINER and others
Interested Party:
JO ANN BARNHART and LONNIE G. SCHMIDT
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HENDERSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2001cv00286
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE and JOYCE HENDERSON
Defendant:
JO ANNE BARNHART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
