Cases 1 - 10 of 71
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENSLEY v. CITY OF CONNERSVILLE AND ITS FAYETTE COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS)
as 1:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
JOSH HENSLEY, SHAINA LAUGHLIN, CHARLEY CATT and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE AND ITS FAYETTE COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SOWDERS v. BYRNE et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
BARRY JUNIOR SANDERS and BARRY JUNIOR SOWDERS
Defendant:
ANDY BURNE, MIKE ISOM, KELLY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BURNS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
TAMMY L. BURNS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BURNS v. WARDEN
as 3:2022cv00174
Petitioner:
146575 DENNIS A. BURNS and DENNIS A. BURNS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNS v. WRIGHT et al
as 3:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
TAVON BURNS
Defendant:
WRIGHT and JESS SNAIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBB v. BURNS et al
as 1:2022cv01486
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL COBB, SR.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN BURNS, CURTIS HILL, NANCY VAIDIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
