Cases 1 - 9 of 9
THOMPSON v. CITY OF SHELBYVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2017cv01055
Defendant:
CITY OF SHELBYVILLE, INDIANA, EDWARD HADLEY, JOSEPH MOHR and others
Plaintiff:
TALMAGE D. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00060
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, GOSS and others
Plaintiff:
WESLEY D. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2017cv00051
Defendant:
GOSS, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION and SMITH
Plaintiff:
WESLEY D. THOMPSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STROMINGER v. IDOC et al
as 1:2015cv01654
Defendant:
C. CONLON, CORIZON, G. EATON and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND STROMINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON et al v. OFFICE OF THE INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2014cv00964
Defendant:
CAMP ATTERBURY, EDINBURGH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
KURTIS W. FINDLEY, ERIC L. REED and DANIEL D. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
THOMPSON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv00474
Respondent:
ANDY CAPPA, COUNTY OF WAYNE, DARRIN DOLEHANTY and others
Petitioner:
DEDRIC D. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01136
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
THOMAS et al v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. THOMAS
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, ALAN FINNAN, BRIAN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAIN et al v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00440
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAIN and JOHN E. THOMAS
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, ALAN FINNAN, BRIAN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
