Cases 1 - 10 of 364
GAINES v. T-MOBILE et al
as 1:2024cv01552
Defendant:
ANDY MOHR CAR DEALERSHIP, IN ADMINISTRATIVE DEPT., HUNNIGTON BANK and others
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS B. GAINES
Cross-Defendant:
1,000 MILES AWAY DIGITAL SCIENTORS WITH THE DIGITAL MANIPULATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCUTERI v. PRETORIUS et al
as 2:2024cv00435
Defendant:
MELINDA MOSS, SERGEANT COOPER, ROBERT DUPREY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOLLETTE v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01434
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ALAN FOLLETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Doe v. OHM APK LLC
as 1:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
OHM APK LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
DOE v. OHM APK LLC
as 1:2024cv01359
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
OHM APK LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
WILDER v. CENTURION OF INDIANA AND EMPLOYEES et al
as 1:2024cv01326
Defendant:
JONES, CENTURION OF INDIANA AND EMPLOYEES, VANDERVORT and others
Plaintiff:
EARL D. WILDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. KELLY et al
as 1:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
ALLISON L KELLY, RYAN KELLY and KEVIN M KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CHINCHILLA v. STATE OF IND et al
as 1:2024cv01247
Defendant:
JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, STATE OF IND and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE LOPEZ CHINCHILLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE et al v. HAMILTON SOUTHEASTERN SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv01195
Defendant:
BASEL MAAROUF, TIGE BUTTS, HAMILTON SOUTHEASTERN SCHOOL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and DOE JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
