Cases 1 - 10 of 17
WALKER v. DOE(S)
as 2:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
JOHNIE AKWAN WALKER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DOE(S)
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
JOHNIE AKWAN WALKER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2023cv01307
Plaintiff:
EDWIN N. HOLMES
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
RANDALL JONES and City of Westfield, Indiana
Defendant:
WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAKOTA FOOTE, KAEDEN GEBHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HERNANDEZ v. BROWN et al
as 2:2021cv00194
Plaintiff:
ROSALIO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
ANDREA STROUP, CHARLES DUGAN, RICHARD BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEWELERS MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. ACTION SECURITY, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00217
Defendant:
KEN KRAPF, LOSS PREVENTION OF LOUISVILLE, LLC, JOHN DOE(S) and others
Plaintiff:
JEWELERS MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HACHMEISTER v. DOE(S) 1-5
as 1:2019cv03783
Plaintiff:
BRAYDEN HACHMEISTER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE(S) 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIRIG v. GEO/NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv00070
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, JANE DOE(S), JOHN DOE(S) and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. DIRIG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER-RILEY v. DENSON et al
as 1:2014cv00332
Defendant:
TERRANCE DENSON and JOHN DOE(S)
Plaintiff:
KERRIE J. WALKER-RILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
