Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HENSLEY v. MADISON COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN HENSLEY
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY, MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MADISON COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv02864
Plaintiff:
PAUL ERIC BROWN
Defendant:
THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, JOHN DOE OFFICER 1, JOHN DOE OFFICER 2 and others
4Th Party Defendant:
JOHN DOE OFFICER 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHMITT v. DOE 1-6 et al
as 3:2021cv00051
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-2, AMY BRADY, KATRINA SANDERS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ROSS SCHMITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARR v. CHRONIC CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv04038
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-2, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CHRONIC CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WELDON CARROLL and ROBERT WELDON CARR, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRY v. CITY OF MUNCIE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv01422
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE OFFICERS 2-50, POLICE CHIEF JOSEPH WINKLE and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KORYEYON v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2019cv01050
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1 2 and 3, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE MARION COUNTY, INDIANA and KERRY J FORESTAL, SHERIFF OF MARION COUNTY, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
SAMSON KORYEYON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GERRISH v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2018cv02021
Plaintiff:
CHARITY GERRISH
Defendant:
JOHN DOE OFFICER #2, FNU EDWARDS, RONALD REHMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
HUNTER v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2010cv00298
Defendant:
STEVEN J. EICHHOLTZ, JOHN DOE NO. 1, JOHN DOE NO. 2 and others
Narcotics Division:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT.
Superior Court #20 Division:
MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
