Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HARRIS v. GRAGE
as 1:2021cv03024
Plaintiff:
BYRON L HARRIS and BYRON HARRIS
Defendant:
CRAIG GRAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv02978
Plaintiff:
JAYME SMITH
Defendant:
COLTIN CLARK, PATTY CLOUSE, LIND L. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02504
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
KELSEY L. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HARRIS v. KRUEGER
as 2:2018cv00303
Defendant:
J. E. KRUEGER, WILLIAM E. WILSON and DAVID LUKENS
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE HARRIS and ARTHUR L. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE: HARRIS III
as 1:2016mc00016
In Re:
EDWARD L. HARRIS, III
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
ADAMS et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2012cv01806
Plaintiff:
KENDALE L. ADAMS, MARTA E. BELL, VINCENT C. BURKE and others
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARRIS v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2011cv01587
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARGETT v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01316
Defendant:
DAVID CLARK, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., MICHELLE L. HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. HARGETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ESTATE OF JAMES BOWMAN v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00869
Defendant:
DR. ELTON AMOS, M.D., DR. RICHARD M. CARR, M.D., CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JAMES BOWMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
WIPPEL v. GAINEYCORPORATION et al
as 4:2007cv00161
Plaintiff:
EDWARD F. WIPPEL, III, EDWARD F. WIPPEL, III and EDWARD F. WIPPEL, III
Defendant:
GAINEYCORPORATION, SUPER SERVICE, INC., FRANKIE L. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
