Cases 1 - 10 of 85
BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISING LLC et al v. BLU MOO ICE CREAM INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISING LLC and BR IP HOLDER LLC
Defendant:
BLU MOO ICE CREAM INC. and ROBERT HOLOCHER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
ROBBINS v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY L. ROBBINS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ROBBINS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
TYLER ROBBINS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBBINS v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ROBBINS, JR.
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. C. et al
as 4:2020cv00243
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
KENNETH GRAY, HOLLY JACOBS, S.C. A MINOR BY TARA ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCRUGGS v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2020cv02523
Defendant:
A. SMITH, TY ROBBINS, PRETORIS and others
Plaintiff:
ARLIN A. SCRUGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBBINS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv06130
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and COOK GROUP INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
JOYCE ROBBINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISING LLC et al v. RADHAKRISHNA LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00237
Defendant:
RADHAKRISHNA LLC, MUKESH NAIK and NAIK'S, LLC
Plaintiff:
BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISING LLC and BR IP HOLDER LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
