Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 64
ROBEY v. FENNIG et al
as 1:2024cv01315
Defendant: FENNIG and ANDERSON
Plaintiff: TERRELL JAMES ROBEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRELL v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2024cv01130
Plaintiff: MELISSA TERRELL
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CARUTHERS v. USA
as 2:2024cv00309
Petitioner: TERRELL CARUTHERS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WAGNER v. NAWAZ et al
as 1:2024cv00878
Plaintiff: TERRELL WAGNER
Defendant: EAGLE TRANSPORT, INC. and ATHER NAWAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
WHITE v. NONE
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff: TERRELL U. WHITE
Defendant: NONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWANN v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2023cv01942
Plaintiff: TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant: MARK SEVIER, KIDD, RUNYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. PRETORIOUS
as 1:2023cv01246
Petitioner: TERRELL U. WHITE
Respondent: PATRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
T.L. et al v. DICKERSON et al
as 1:2023cv00318
Plaintiff: T. L. and C. J.
Defendant: TERRENCE DICKERSON, TERRELL WILLIAMS, CYNEQUA UNDERWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICKLES v. INTERNATIONAL -CUSTOMS FEDERICO DEGETAU et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00521
Plaintiff: TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL -CUSTOMS FEDERICO DEGETAU, TAX DIVISION OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO, MONGOLA, CHINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MICKLES v. MIRIO et al
as 2:2022cv00520
Plaintiff: TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant: MIRIO, AARRON REYNOLDS, PATRICE POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?