Cases 1 - 10 of 24
PEGAN v. ROY et al
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PEGAN
Defendant:
ROY, CASEY, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. TORRES et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
BRITTANY A. TORRES, KYLEIGH J. INGALIS, LETICIA MARTINEZ-MATEOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONWELL v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEO CONWELL
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH, RAY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MENZIE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. MENZIE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CITY OF NEW CASTLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. JOSEPH et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE
Defendant:
SAMMIE JOSEPH, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (IDOC), R. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOTEN v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00100
Petitioner:
RONALD WOOTEN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BIBB v. LOOP et al
as 4:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
GEURIN D. BIBB
Defendant:
FRANK LOOP, SGT DANGLER, SGT GEARY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORRES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M. TORRES
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT, INDIANA STATE POLICE SUPERINTENDENT, DOUGLAS G. CARTER in his individual capacity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
