Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Sanders v. Wilber et al
as 2:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Sanders
Defendant:
James Wilber, Kelli Chapman, Patrick Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Marcus F. Chapman
Defendant:
Garret Hensley, Arthur Fannin, Robert Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Marcus F. Chapman
Defendant:
Garret Hensley, Arthur Fannin, Robert Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Marcus Fitzgang Chapman
Defendant:
Garret A. Hensley, Officer Fannin and Robert Bowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Marcus F. Chapman
Defendant:
Garret Hensley, Arthur Fannin, Robert Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams et al vs 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00082
Defendant:
Network Supply, 3M Company, American Optical Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Adams, Alice Adams, Edward Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Chapman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 6:2021cv00080
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell Chapman
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. USA
as 6:2020cv00198
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Courtney Kentrell Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Royalty v. Chandler et al
as 5:2020cv00401
Defendant:
Captain Mrs. Tabott, Brandi Renee Ritchie, Judge Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Garrett Eugene Royalty, II and Garratt Eugene Royalty, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Evans et al
as 5:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Mayor Linda Gorton, Zachary West, Chief Lawrence Weathers and others
Plaintiff:
Liam Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
