Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Hughes v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hughes, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hughes v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hughes
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moore v. Hughes
as 2:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Michael Ernest Moore
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Webb v. Whitley County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2023cv00188
Executor:
Tammy Webb
Defendant:
Whitley County, Kentucky, Brian Lawson, Sula Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. SSA
as 6:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Frances Darlene Hughes
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hughes v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jason Hughes
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Simpson v. Day et al
as 5:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Joshua Emmanuel Simpson
Defendant:
Connie Day, Dan Brown, Craig Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Branham et al
as 7:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Heath Anthony Baker, Ashley, Anthony Heath Baker and others
Defendant:
Christy Branham, Kentucky Parole Board, Cookie Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Hughes et al
as 6:2022cv00208
Defendant:
Tammy Croley, Pamela Collett Hughes, Francis Witt-Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Morgan Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
